The Mercenaries and the NGOs

Home Forums Polo’s Rabble The Mercenaries and the NGOs

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #3797
      flipflop
      Member

      August 26, 2010

      Privatizing the Occupation

      The Mercenaries and the NGOs

      By YVES ENGLER

      http://www.counterpunch.org/engler08262010.html

      Market extremists argue that the private sector can do almost
      everything better than governments. The most extreme do not
      concede the qualifier “almost” and argue that even the police and
      army should be privatized.

      The growth of private security companies (PSC) is generally seen
      as a result of the success of extreme market arguments.

      Less commented upon is a parallel growth of non-governmental
      organizations (NGOs) engaged in healthcare, education and social
      services development, especially in the Third World, that was
      once provided by public institutions.

      Interestingly, at least one insider has linked the two. An
      advisor to ArmorGroup and former NGO employee, James Fennell,
      explains these organizations similar historical trajectory: “The
      increasing role of commercial security companies may be viewed in
      a similar vein to the increased policy and technical input of
      NGOs over the past two decades to the provision of official
      relief and development assistance to Southern nations.”

      Beyond similar ideological roots, PSCs and NGOs often have more
      direct ties. Recently, CARE, Save the Children, CARITAS and World
      Vision all hired PSCs to protect their operations abroad.

      Worried about their image Western NGOs generally prefer to
      conceal their ties to PSCs but a number of technical studies shed
      light on the topic. One survey found that “every major
      international humanitarian organization (defined as the UN
      humanitarian agencies and the largest international NGOs) has
      paid for armed security in at least one operational context, and
      approximately 22% of the major humanitarian organizations
      reported using armed security services during the last year
      [2007].”

      USAID required the NGOs it contracted in post-occupation Iraq to
      hire private security. According to Corey Levine, a human-rights
      consultant, “My organization, a small NGO working to build the
      capacity of Iraq’s civil society, was no exception. Approximately
      40 percent of our $60 million budget went to protecting the 15
      international staff. Our security company was South African.”

      CARE USA also hired former South African military personnel to
      protect their operation in Iraq. Peter Singer, author of
      Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry,
      describes the militarization of NGO work in Iraq. “The extent to
      which things have changed is illustrated by one non-governmental
      humanitarian organization that hired a PMF [private military
      firm] in Iraq to protect its facilities and staff, a contract
      which included the NGOs hiring snipers.”

      The occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan significantly increased
      NGO-PSC ties. In 2006 Singer noted, “Industry representatives
      estimate that approximately 25 percent of the ‘high-end’ firms
      that provide armed services and over 50 percent of firms
      providing logistical support have worked for humanitarian
      clients.” ArmorGroup, Global Risk Strategies, RONCO, Control
      Risks Group, Erinys, Hart Security, Lifeguard, MPRI, KROLL,
      Olive, Southern Cross, Triple Canopy and Blackwater have
      apparently all worked for humanitarian organizations.

      ArmorGroup is an NGO favorite. In 2002 its clients included
      UNICEF, CARE, CARITAS and the Red Cross. ArmorGroup markets
      itself to NGOs. They’ve hired a former CARE UK official, James
      Fennell, and claim to be an industry leader in setting ethical
      standards. While this may be true, the company has seen its share
      of scandals. Last August one of its employees shot and killed two
      colleagues and wounded his Iraqi interpreter. Before joining
      ArmorGroup Danny Fitzsimons had a number of run-ins with the law
      in England and was let go by another PSC for unstable behavior.
      Corporate Mercenaries describes another scandal: “Defence Systems
      Colombia (DSC), a subsidiary of DSL (now ArmorGroup), was
      implicated in providing detailed intelligence to the notorious
      XVIth Brigade of the Colombian army, identifying groups opposed
      to [oil company] BPs presence in the region of Casanare. This
      intelligence has been linked to executions and disappearances. “

      Southern Cross is another PSC working for aid agencies that
      portrays itself as an ethical-minded enterprise. But it also has
      a murky past. Southern Cross was founded in Sierra Leone in 1999
      by Cobus Claasens, an officer at Executive Outcomes, which was
      created by former Special Forces from apartheid South Africa.

      Before beyond disbanded Executive Outcomes was the face of all
      that is wrong with PSCs. Today, that distinction is held by Xe
      Services, formerly Blackwater, which has its own ties to NGOs. A
      2006 Humanitarian Policy Group report claimed Blackwater had been
      contracted by humanitarian groups and in February Pakistan’s
      North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) Minister, Bashir Bilour,
      admitted that “Blackwater is present in Pakistan and is operating
      in the NWFP as well as other areas. Bilour said that Blackwater
      was engaged in guarding U.S. consulate staff and foreign NGO
      workers.”

      Any group claiming a “humanitarian” or “development” purpose
      should obviously not hire Blackwater, but where should the line
      be drawn? Contracting even the most principled PSC opens up a
      series of ethical questions.

      By hiring PSCs are humanitarian organizations endorsing the
      booming private security business? PSCs are generally keen to
      discuss their ties to NGOs because they believe it helps
      “legitimate their business.”

      Koenraad Van Brabant asks a more important question. By hiring
      PSCs are NGOs “contributing to increased wider, public security”
      or “the privatization of security, whereby those who are able to
      pay can buy security while others have to live in fear”? NGO
      personnel may have the means to purchase security, but this is
      not a luxury afforded to most.

      Reliant on contracts from Western governments NGOs often follow
      the military into war zones. In these settings they are often
      perceived as hostile agents of an occupying power. As a result
      they need security.

      Is it really any surprise that NGOs, which replace public
      institutions delivering services turn to PSCs, which do the same?

      Yves Engler is the co-author of Canada in Haiti: Waging War on
      the Poor Majority. His most recent book is Canada and Israel:
      Building Apartheid. For more information, go to his website,
      yvesengler.com

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

    • #12598
      ROB
      Keymaster

      The history of Monaco makes me nervous though. ;)

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.